And when the remainder of the council give their old stand by excuse that the state could sue us, we need Donna Westfall to stand up to them and remind them that Santa Barbara does not, and never did allow hydrofluorosilicic acid aka "fluoride" in Santa Barbara’s drinking water.
Do you remember last year around election time, when the Republicans Party (paid $1,000 by California Dental Association). and Democratic Party (Paid $1,000 by the California Dental Association), the Crescent City City Council members (with the exception of Donna Westfall), Del Norte County Supervisors, the Del Norte County School Board, First 5 Board, and 1 OB/GYN. 3 pediatricians, AND THE EDITOR OF THE DAILY TRIPLICATE PROCLAIMED IT WAS A "NO BRAINER" AND ALL THE DENTISTS SAID FLUORIDE WAS GOOD FOR YOU, AND IF IT WAS REMOVED FROM THE WATER, OUR TOOTH DECAY PROBLEMS WOULD RAPIDLY INCREASE AND TAXES WOULD GO UP?
AND 3 MONTHS LATER THE EPA FINALLY ANNOUNCES , TOO MUCH FLUORIDE – 41% OF NATIONS KIDS HAD FLUOROSIS (which is the first sign of fluoride poisoning).
THAT KIND OF MAKES CAVITIES A WALK IN THE PARK COMPARED TO DEALING WITH FLUOROSIS AND DENTAL AND MAYBE MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS’S AND TREATMENTS, AND WHO KNOWS WHAT OTHER ORGANS ARE INVOLVED AND THE DAMAGE TO THE NERVOUS SYSTEM AND TO THE BONES.
AS YOU CAN NOW SEE WITH THIS NEWLY ACQUIRED HINDSIGHT THAT THE SUPPORTERS OF MEASURE A TO REMOVE HYDROFLUOROSILICIC ACID FROM OUR DRINKING WATER WERE NOT EVIL, OR TRYING TO HARM YOU. WE, AS MEDICAL PEOPLE, VERY CONCERNED CITIZENS, AND ONE (1) ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE, HAD AND CONTINUE TO HAVE ALL OF OUR BEST INTERESTS AT HEART AND MIND.
THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE AND LOGICAL CONCLUSION TO THIS EVENT IS TO TOTALLY REMOVE HYDROFLUOROSILICIC ACID FROM OUR WATER IMMEDIATELY AND TOTALLY,
AND IF THERE IS AN EPIDEMIC OF DECAY SUDDENLY AFFECTING THE CITIZENS OF DEL NORTE COUNTY WE WILL DEAL WITH IT BY GETTING THEM SOME TOOTHPASTE, TOOTHBRUSHES AND XYLITOL GUM.
THE PRO TOXIC INDUSTRIAL WASTE PEOPLE HAD THEIR OPPORTUNITY FOR MORE THAN 50 YEARS AND HAVE FAILED MISERABLY.
Crescent City spends $30,000 to add this toxic industrial waste product to our water supply and have it tested daily. 99% of that $30,000 is poured down the drain in watering lawns and gardens, and washing clothes and dishes. The final 1% is consumed without any monitoring for side-effects ordinarily required for any drug.
THE ONLY EXPLANATION FOR THE EPA TO WANT TO TITRATE THE TOXIC WASTE SLOWLY IS SO WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEE EXACTLY HOW MISERABLY THEY HAVE FAILED AND TO KEEP FROM EXPERIENCING THE LITIGATION HISTORY THE TOBACCO COMPANIES EXPERIENCED WHEN THE PUBLIC REALIZES HYDROFLUOROSILICIC ACID (TOXIC INDUSTRIAL WASTE) IS AS GOOD FOR YOUR TEETH AS TOBACCO IS FOR YOUR LUNGS!
THE MEASURE “A” PROPONENTS SPENT THEIR OWN MONEY TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC. THIS WAS TRULY A GRASSROOTS PROJECT.
THE MEASURE” A” OPPONENTS HAD THE CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION, A LOBBY GROUP, POUR IN OVER $24,000 TO CONFUSE THE PUBLIC WITH THEIR STANDARD RHETORIC.
ASK YOUR DENTIST OR YOUR DOCTOR IF THEY DID THEIR HOMEWORK AND KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT THE PRODUCT PUT INTO OUR WATER IS NOT ONLY SAFE, BUT SAFE FOR ALL. BECAUSE YOU WILL SOON FIND OUT THAT THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT. INSTEAD, THEY CHOSE TO REMAIN IGNORANT ABOUT THE TOXIC INDUSTRIAL WASTE. THEY DID NOT PRACTICE THE MANDATORY DUE DILIGENCE REQUIRED FROM THEM BEFORE TRYING TO INFLUENCE THE PUBLIC TO CONTINUE EXPOSING THEMSELVES, THEIR NEIGHBORS AND OUR COUNTIES CHILDREN MANY TIMES A DAY TO THIS TOXIC INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRODUCT BEING FRAUDULENTLY ADVERTISED AS SAFE AND A NECESSITY FOR HEALTHY TEETH.
If the city council continues to keep the citizen’s hostage, and keep Donna Westfall censured, requiring us to drink this toxic waste after the EPA has admitted to knowing hydrofluorosilicic acid is the cause for this terrible disease, dental fluorosis, that has ruined 41% of this nations’ teenagers’ teeth (AND ONLY GOD KNOWS ALL THE OTHER HEALTH PROBLEMS EVERYONE HAS ACQUIRED ALONG WITH DENTAL FLUOROSIS from being forced to drink this toxic waste)