Sat. May 25th, 2024

By Jon Coupal – January 24, 2020

The “Proposition 13” on the March 3, 2020, ballot is a $15 billion school construction bond, but it would
cost taxpayers far more than $15 billion. That’s why the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is opposed
to this Proposition 13. This measure would increase the state’s debt and interest costs, raise the caps on
local school district borrowing, and put a thumb on the scale in favor of costly Project Labor Agreements
that sharply raise the cost of construction projects and use taxpayer dollars inefficiently.

Too Much State Debt

The March ballot’s Proposition 13 is a $15 billion General Obligation bond that will cost $27 billion with
interest to pay off over 35 years. The cost to the General Fund will be about $740 million annually. This
debt has first call on General Fund revenue, meaning that this bond debt interest needs to be funded
first before any other programs, including Medi-Cal and law enforcement, can be supported.
Currently our debt service ratio (the amount of the General Fund that goes exclusively to paying off G.O.
bond debt) stands at about six percent. While it can be debated whether this number is too high or too
low, it’s important to keep this figure in mind before we obligate ourselves to more debt. This is
especially true with a looming recession always on the horizon.

Costly Increase in Local Debt

The current local school district debt cap is 1.25 percent of the total assessed value of taxable property
in the district. The March ballot’s Proposition 13 increases this amount to two percent for elementary
and most high school districts. The cap applies to cumulative outstanding debt from all school district
bonds regardless of when they were approved by voters. By way of example, let’s say a school district
approved three local Proposition 39 bonds between 2010-2016 and hit their debt cap. While voters
could approve bonds after that point, the school district wouldn’t be able to sell them unless a) taxable
property value increased or b) debt was paid down. If approved, this Proposition 13 would allow the
school district to sell more existing bonds or put new ones on the ballot. Regardless, this will increase
property taxes on all homes and businesses as more bonds will be sold.

Costly Project Labor Agreements

The March ballot’s Proposition 13 makes it clear that local school districts that apply for state matching
funds will receive additional priority, especially in certain funding categories, if they use a Project Labor
Agreement or PLA. While this ballot measure only promotes and doesn’t mandate a PLA, the concern is
that this will put greater pressure on school districts to approve them in order to receive these bond
dollars should the measure pass. By freezing out non-union contractors and decreasing competitive
bids, PLAs have been clearly shown to increase construction costs and are thus are not an effective use of taxpayer dollars.

Paid for by No New Taxes, a Project of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
Not authorized or paid for by a candidate for any office or a committee controlled by a candidate for any office.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *