Sat. Oct 24th, 2020

By Donna Westfall – March 8, 2016 – The ordinance that increases sewer rates was adopted last night by the Crescent City, City Council, in a unanimous vote; but first there was lengthy discussion.

In Ordinance #792 were the WHEREAS clauses.

Bear in mind that there are five council members that supposedly read these things. There’s a City Attorney, Martha Rice, that supposedly prepares these things.  There’s an active City Manager, that supposedly reads these things. There’s City Staff that supposedly reads these things.

And yet, no one connected to the city receiving a city paycheck caught this four letter error that could have increased your sewer rates an additional year and another 5% for a total…. wait for it….. 25% increase instead of 20% increase in your sewer rates:

  • WHEREAS, the City of Crescent City find it necessary to implement sewer service rate increases each year for the next five years to stabilize and support the sewer fund.

FIVE vs FOUR.  “It was just a typo,” says Atty Martha Rice.

This is very reminiscent of another boo boo played on the public dating back to March, 2008 when the City Council approved the one and only bid for $37+ million by Wahland, started construction, and then six months later decided they better to do a Prop 218 protest. Only then it was for $42.5 million, and oops, that ultimately turned in to a $43.8 million loan.

It’s called shoving this white elephant wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) upgrade/expansion loan amount down our throats is what it’s called.  After all, we (The CITY) would be sued if the sewer rates didn’t pass and heavens to Betsy, we don’t want to be sued and go into bankruptcy, do we?

Well….let’s think about that.

Should the City declare bankruptcy?  Every other aspect of their operation is running just fine and in the black.

Except for the WWTP by virtue of ever increasing rates on an already over-burdened rate paying public.

Should the City declare bankruptcy?

OR

Should the City look for other means of supporting their white elephant?  Like cutting salaries, eliminating merit bonuses….. oh….. let’s look at merit bonuses for a sec.

March 15, 2010 published in the Triplicate by reporter, Nick Grube:

  • “Council looks at merit pay for city staff.
  •  Move comes despite the budget shortfall

Guess who signed up?

Jim Barnts.  The former Public Works Director. And every other department head.

If you can believe our City Council, and sorry, I don’t for the most part because they have a piss poor track record relating to the WWTP and sewer rates, there’s only about $100,000 short fall per year on the WWTP budget and the newly increased sewer rates should take care of that.

Um…. well if it’s only $100,000 short, maybe they need to eliminate a position or two in addition to cutting salaries.

Oh my gosh! Did no one from the City think of this option?

Apparently not

Maybe someone from the public ought to write them a note and suggest it.

Then again, they don’t read very well, do they?

Maybe they can read, REFERENDUM.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 thoughts on “Simple typo or intentional fraud?”
  1. This was NOT a typo. It was intentional in order the city to get an extra year of YOUR MONEY.
    The council was aware of this fraudulent claim and they should ALL BE RECALLED. The City attorney, city manager and city clerk should be fired immediately. Crescent City deserves better.

    Thank you Donna for catching this fraud!

  2. You should do what I did, and stand in line to pay your bill, then just listen for a few minutes after. Water bills for every single person that asked were going up from $30 a month to $80 a month. This is not an exaggeration. Not one single person, while I was standing there, had a water bill that was going down. Apparently that is rarer than a unicorn. On top of that, the city is changing rate structures on some houses/bizs.

    I used to read the CC Times with some amusement, but apparently CC Times is right – this city appears completely corrupt. I’m lucky enough to be in a position to leave, and that is what I am currently working on. CC is totally out of control, and I will be very happy to leave the place I once loved.

  3. This is an election year and the one person who should have listened to the people of crescent city demonstrated a deaf ear. Why? To go along to get along..I personally would not elect this person who is running for city council. Furthermore, the people of Crescent City should exercise their civil rights for a change and recall them all as they did in Los Osos, California. The only way to beat these people is get them out of office and elect someone who will listen to the people instead of playing the “get- along, go-along game.

  4. As i see it, the first reading should have been read again after the change was made with the word “four” replacing the word “five.” This is more than a typo, it is a substantive mistake. And because it meets the criteria (being substantive) makes the second reading a mute point. The city attorneys laughable excuse and reasoning was laughable. But I guess the joke is on us. This was just one of the shady goings-on at Monday nights meeting. (Could the Mayor be anymore flippant and dismissive towards the speakers?)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.