Donna, you are as feisty as ever! Keep ’em honest. It would not be surprising that hijinks are in play. I’m hoping that District 3 residents are ready for change.
Donna, will this be an actual back and forth debate with questions from the audience or will it be canned questions with no opportunities for all candidates to respond?
I don’t know how tonight’s debate will be handled, but last night in Smith River, there was quite a bit of back and forth, including one woman asking questions of
Hank Akin but interrupting him every other second. I call her “Green Jacket.” At one point I had to call her out and said, “Lady, you’d don’t know what you’re talking about.”
I figured she was a shill for Chris Howard.
It was a canned debate with no audience participation. Not particularly satisfying from the audiences’ stand point, and does not bode well for the two remaining “debates” with regard to districts four and five. Plenty of pure advertisement from Howard, a lot of “I’s” from Magarino and a great deal of respect from me over Joe’s responses which for once were not those of a jaded politician. See the opinion piece in the Times. But as an event to judge a candidates value to individual concerns not such a worth while event.
Donna, you are as feisty as ever! Keep ’em honest. It would not be surprising that hijinks are in play. I’m hoping that District 3 residents are ready for change.
Donna, will this be an actual back and forth debate with questions from the audience or will it be canned questions with no opportunities for all candidates to respond?
I don’t know how tonight’s debate will be handled, but last night in Smith River, there was quite a bit of back and forth, including one woman asking questions of
Hank Akin but interrupting him every other second. I call her “Green Jacket.” At one point I had to call her out and said, “Lady, you’d don’t know what you’re talking about.”
I figured she was a shill for Chris Howard.
It was a canned debate with no audience participation. Not particularly satisfying from the audiences’ stand point, and does not bode well for the two remaining “debates” with regard to districts four and five. Plenty of pure advertisement from Howard, a lot of “I’s” from Magarino and a great deal of respect from me over Joe’s responses which for once were not those of a jaded politician. See the opinion piece in the Times. But as an event to judge a candidates value to individual concerns not such a worth while event.