There is no “safe” dose of fluoride and most certainly no “optimal” concentration for disposal of this industrial waste through public drinking water supplies.

It is criminal negligence to pretend that dental fluorosis is not an indicator of systemic poisoning by fluoride. There is such a huge resource of science in humans, that reference to animal studies is almost unnecessary. Therefore health officials have a moral duty to go looking for the influence of fluoride on calcification, destruction and carcinogenesis of the bones and soft tissues.

The damage to the kidneys is sufficient reason to immediately cease fluoridation and force the waste producers to immobilize the toxin. But will politicians act to ban this unethical [Awofeso 2012] practice and will bureaucrats confess to their sins?

Because citizens can no longer trust their governments or public servants, they use social media to inform on another of the threat of fluoride to various organs, in this case the kidneys.

Consumers are able to read analytical data, obtained under Freedom of Information law, that shows fluoridation industrial waste, made in Australia or imported from New Zealand or China, carries a host of inorganic sensitizers and carcinogens, many of which further contribute to kidney disease.